Harakahdaily Bidas Zaid Ibrahim Bela Lina Joy Isu Murtad

zaidkecam.JPG

Orang ramai yang menghubungi Harakahdaily, berkata bahawa Zaid cuba bertindak membela Lina Joy dalam permohonannya untuk menukarkan label ‘Islam’ dalam kad pengenalannya.

Dalam akhbar tempatan beliau dipetik sebagai berkata, bahawa isu menukar agama pada kad pengenalan bukanlah bermaksud bahawa Islam dalam ancaman.

“Islam tidak terancam, pemikiran kolot anda yang terancam,” katanya di sebuah forum bertajuk ‘Freedom of Religion and the Federal Constitution,’ anjuran Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia Malaysia (Suhakam) di sini 9 September lalu.

Ahli panel pada forum tesebut adalah pensyarah dari Kuliyah Undang-Undang Ahmad Ibrahim, Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia (UIAM) Profesor Mohammad Hashim Kamali yang membentang topik ‘Human Rights and Islam’ dan Zaid sendiri.

“Kita tidak boleh bercakap perkara itu kerana Tuhan akan menghukumnya (Lina Joy)?Apa masalahnya? Dia bukan lagi Islam jadi Tuhan akan menghukumnya?

“Adakah kita memainkan peranan Tuhan? Adakah kita tahu bahawa Tuhan tidak akan mengampunkannya? Adakah kita tahu?” tanyanya.

“Saya fikir, dia hanya mahu butiran kad pengenalannya ditukar. Jadi biarlah mahkamah yang menentukannya. Tidak perlu kata Islam terancam,” kata Zaid.

Beliau turut menyifatkan rakan ahli Parlimennya menonjolkan ‘kebodohan’ apabila tidak berpuas hati tentang kelemahan undang-undang yang disifatkan membuka ruang lebih ramai umat Islam untuk murtad.

“Itu kebodohan. Tidakkah kita memberi agama kita penghormatan dan pengiktirafan. Tidakkah kita malu dengan kenyataan seperti itu, menunjukkan kita tiada keyakinan terhadap kekuatan nilai-nilai dalam agama kita?” tanyanya lagi.

” Tiada ahli politik mahu menerangkan tentang isu agama kerana ada risiko politik, adalah mudah untuk mendapat sokongan apabila anda bangkitkan isu agama dan perkauman,” katanya.

Ramai yang kecewa dengan sikap Zaid yang secara terang-terangan memperlekehkan perjuangan umat Islam yang mahu membanteras gelaja murtad.

Seorang pemanggil yang tidak mahu dikenali, berkata jika Zaid bercakap tentang hak dan kebebasan beragama, kenapa agama Islam pula dinafikan haknya yang mahu umat Islam melaksanakan hukum-hakamnya seperti mematuhi undang-undang hudud yang termaktub dalam al-Quran.”Islam ada

undang-undang hudud, kenapa dinafikan haknya dan Zaid sendiri pernah mencabar undang-undang tersebut di Kelantan,” katanya.

“Kenapa tiba-tiba nak membela hak dan amalan orang lain sedangkan agama sendiri dinafikan haknya,” kata pemanggil tersebut.

Ada juga yang berpendapat bahawa Zaid cuba bersikap lebih ‘sudu daripada kuah’ dan ‘menderhaka’ kepada bosnya, Dato’ Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi agar perkara Artikel 11 ini tidak dipanjangkan lagi isunya.

Majlis itu dihadiri seramai 500 orang terdiri daripada wakil-wakil kementerian, agensi kerajaan, ahli Parlimen, wakil kedutaan asing, ahli kehakiman, Majlis Peguam, persatuan agama dan budaya serta badan-badan bukan kerajaan (NGO). – lanh

Berikut adalah laporan hujah Zaid dalam salah sebuah akhbar tempatan.

Islam is not under attack: Umno MP
Pauline Puah

KUALA LUMPUR: The use of power and compulsion will not help to resolve controversial religious issues, outspoken Umno parliamentarian Datuk Zaid Ibrahim has said.

“Power, force and compulsion solve nothing … You can put them (apostates) in jail. But (as to) the matter of faith and belief, how do you change them?” he asked at a forum organised by the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam) in conjunction with Malaysian Human Rights Day on Saturday.

The Kota Baru member of Parliament, who was a speaker at the Article 11 forum on constitutional rights disrupted by a group of 500 protesters in May, started by voicing his concerns over recent developments on religious issues in the country.

In his speech entitled “Freedom of Religion and the Federal Constitution”, he took a swipe at certain quarters, including several Muslim lawyers, who claimed that Islam is under attack.

“Islam is not under attack. It is your warped minds under attack,” he said to a round of applause.

Citing two high-profile court cases – that of Lina Joy and S. Shamala – Zaid, a lawyer himself, said these cases should be treated merely as legal situations.

“We can’t talk about it because God will punish her (Lina Joy)? What’s the problem? She’s not a Muslim anymore, so God will punish her surely?

“But do we play God’s role now? How do you know God won’t forgive her? How do you know?” he asked the silent floor.

“I thought she just wanted to get her ID (identity card) changed. So let the courts decide it. There is no need to say Islam is under attack,” Zaid said, thumping the rostrum.

Lina Joy, a Muslim who “converted” to Christianity, had appealed to remove the word “Islam” from her identity card, sparking wide debate on religious freedom in the country.

Lawyer Malik Imtiaz Sarwar who held a watching brief for the Bar Council in her case, recently received death threats for voicing his legal opinions on the issue.

Shamala, a Hindu mother, is asking the court to declare that her two sons’ conversion to Islam by her estranged Muslim convert husband Dr M. Jeyaganesh, is invalid. The case was adjourned in the Court of Appeal in July, pending the Federal Court’s decision in the Lina Joy case.

Zaid said that under Islamic teaching, if one is seen as having strayed from the true path, greater mercy and understanding should be accorded to him.

“I thought we should show more mercy in cases like these? … We should understand why they want to do that.

“(But) no, you can’t do that because you have power … What’s the problem in these so-called issues confronting ummah?” he asked.

Zaid said Muslims should have more confidence in a religion which is heavily supported by the state.

“We should be confident enough. There should be no fear. For God’s sake, the civil court is not our enemy. Our judicial system has upheld the rule of law.”

He described his fellow parliamentarians as showing “stupidity” by arguing that the absence of rules on apostasy would open the floodgates to Muslims becoming apostates.

“That’s stupidity. Do we not give our religion more respect and recognition? Do we not shame ourselves by making such statements, and show that we have no confidence in the intrinsic worth of our religion?”

Zaid said the government should explain religious issues to ordinary people to avoid misunderstanding and unnecessary tension.

He also attributed the tensions that have arisen to politicians who use the religious card to gain political mileage.

“No one (politicians) wants to explain religious issues because there’s a political risk there … It is easy to get instant recognition and support when you raise religious and racial issues.”

Zaid urged the government to maintain the integrity and purity of Islam by allowing discussion.

Another speaker at the forum chaired by Suhakam commissioner Datuk Michael Yeoh was renowned Afghan-born scholar, Mohamad Hashim Kamali, a professor at the International Islamic University.

Answering a question from the floor, Mohd Hashim said that if the purpose is to advocate good, non-Muslims should be allowed to discuss and question Islam.

Noting that Islam has a long history of recognising other religions and that interfaith dialogue was thus Islamic in itself, he said Muslims should not monopolize and isolate the religion.

Earlier in his speech on “Human Rights from an Islamic Perspective”, Mohd Hashim said human rights elements are enshrined in Islamic holy texts, particularly the Quran – theSunstrong

http://www.harakahdaily.net/v2/

Pandangan Ana : Zaid Ibrahim pernah saman Kerajaan Kelantan isu hudud. Zaid calon Islam Liberal yang setaraf dengan Anwar Ibrahim dan boleh diharap jika sesuatu berlaku kepada Anwar selepas kes liwatnya diputuskan.

Dalam hal ini PAS sangat jijik sanggup menerima Zaid Ibrahim yang masih lagi tidak ‘bertaubat’ dan sehingga kini masih lagi disangsikan ‘moralnya’ berkenaan isu arak.

Jika kriteria memilih pemimpin sudah tidak ada lagi dalam kamus perjuangan PAS maka kita akan melihat Yahudi Zionis sudah berjaya meliberalkan PAS hingga boleh apa sahaja atau selari dengan slogan hebat mereka iaitu PAS FOR ALL

Ia juga bermakna isu liwat tidak menjadi isu besar kepada orang PAS kerana mereka pasti akan menerima siapa sahaja menjadi pemimpin atas dasar tahaluf siyasi.

Oppssss…… Israel For All ada juga.

Mana satu tiru yang mana ni?

Pas tiru Israel atau Israel tiru Pas ?

Rasanya ???

Orang PAS tidak perlu mengundi atau berkempen untuk Zaid Ibrahim.. Elok undurkan diri dari bersubahat dengan penentang hudud PAS tempoh hari.

One Response

  1. Rasulullah s.a.w. bersabda yang bermaksud: �Sifat malu itu akan menghasilkan kebaikan.� – Riwayat Al-Bukhari dan Muslim

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: